My Photo

Help Support this Site

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

« Can Miracles Happen? - Updated | Main | Speaking of Disarmament »

June 28, 2009

Comments

Randy, I gotta go against conventional wisdom pronounced by all, including Obama (whom I support on most other things), the OAS, you, Boz, Greg, at al, on the Honduran coup. References to rule of law, due process, and so on, are all well and good, and valid only so far as all parties to a given dispute are willing to adhere to said rules, processes, and so on. Zelaya violated several Constitutional articles expressly written to prevent his kind of referendum initiative. As well, he ignored Constitutional and legal actions taken by the Honduran Supreme Court, the Electoral Tribunal and the Congress there to force him to comply with the Constitution and the law. In short, Zelaya went rogue and went off the legal reservation in his push to keep himself in office. Absolutely no one, including the OAS, or the USG (Obama) can assert that Zelaya would have submitted himself to the due process of impeachment, which he certainly deserved. On the contrary, had the other branches of government been foolish enough to play by the rules that Zelaya flaunted, they would very soon have been subjugated to executive authority as has happened in Venezuela (and will happen soon in Ecuador, I'm afraid).

I lived in Honduras two times for a total of seven years. While I wouldn't qualify Honduran politicians as the most honest or visionary of their kind, I think they got it right this time in 1) establishing rules to prevent Presidential dictatorships we see springing up elsewher in the region; 2) acting on those rules to try and head off Zelaya's move toward continuance (and almost assuredly consolidation) of power; and 3) having the courage to act swiftly and decisively - and by exactly the same rules used by Zelaya - to get this rogue out of the country.

I know none of the above is politically correct in this day and age, but unfortunately, Chavez, Correa, Morales, Ortega - and pretty quick here, Uribe - are all using politically correct rules (Constitutions) to keep themselves in power indefinitely, suborn democratic institutions, and abuse the democratic rights of their countrymen. This is morally and politically wrong, and it's injurious to long term development interests of the region. Somehow, in contrast, little backward Honduras got it right both in terms of its Constitution and in terms of being willing to get down and play dirty just like the bad guys. It ain't pretty, it ain't clean, but Honduras showed someone like Chavez that if you play by the very same rules, you can whip them at their nefarious game... regards, T

Tambopaxi:
You articulates my exact sentiments. Zayala deliberately gave the finger to the various institutions charged with safeguarding the constitution. So he violated the very laws he'd sworn to uphold and protect.

It's good that Zayala was kicked out but regret that the Honduran example won't be influential enough to influence other Latin Amercan countries like Venezuela, Ecuador or Nicaragua

Yeah, too bad we can't have a string of military dictatorships across Latin America to protect democracy. Jeez.

I linked Tambopaxi's comments with approval!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003