. . . Just not by Pat Robertson. No one said it better, more succinctly and more eloquently understated than Shepard Smith:
One wonders what sort of joy Robertson feels from dancing on the graves of the poor.
« Help Haiti - Updated | Main | Guantanamo »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Luz Arce: Inferno: A Story of Terror and Survival in Chile (Living in Latin America)
Michela Wrong: I Didn't Do It for You: How the World Betrayed a Small African Nation (P.S.)
Franklin Foer: How Soccer Explains the World : An Unlikely Theory of Globalization
HOWARD W. FRENCH: A Continent for the Taking : The Tragedy and Hope of Africa
Jorge Edwards: Persona Non Grata : A Memoir of Disenchantment with the Cuban Revolution
Aviva Chomsky: The Cuba Reader: History, Culture, Politics (Latin America Readers)
John Gimlette: At the Tomb of the Inflatable Pig : Travels Through Paraguay
John Dinges: The Condor Years: How Pinochet and His Allies Brought Terrorism to Three Continents
Gabriela Nouzeilles: The Argentina Reader: History, Culture, Politics
Robert M. Levine: The Brazil Reader: History, Culture, Politics (Latin American Readers)
Geoffrey Robertson: Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice
Samantha Power: A Problem from Hell : America and the Age of Genocide
Ann Louise Bardach: Cuba Confidential: Love and Vengeance in Miami and Havana
Luciana Souza: Duos II (*****)
Andy Bey: American Song (*****)
Luciana Souza: Brazilian Duos (*****)
Luciana Souza: Neruda (*****)
Milton Nascimento: Pietá (*****)
Luciana Souza: North and South (*****)
Celso Fonseca: Natural (****)
Renato Braz: Outro Quilombo (*****)
What a jackass.
Posted by: Akaky | January 14, 2010 at 05:53 PM
A certain Lily Coyle certainly explains things to Robertson here: http://www.startribune.com/opinion/letters/81595442.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUqEiaDUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU
Posted by: JB | January 16, 2010 at 11:55 PM
Aside from the obvious fact that Robertson's remarks are bizzare, ammoral and pretty much the definition of "Unchristian", they also show a total lack of religious conviction. He needs to assert that God is punishing Haitian children for the sins of their forefathers because he is uncomfortable with a world in which bad things happen to good people. His reasoning seems to contradict most of the teachings of Christ, but he would rather be hypocritical than face the psychological dissonance that most of us come to terms with when we are about 5 - that the world is sometimes an unjust place. Most people's moral underpinnings and even, dare I say it, faith, are strong enough to withstand the "slings and arrows" that life throws at them. I am guessing some Haitians may be questioning their beliefs right now, but I bet many of them will come out the other end still holding onto their moral foundation. Robertson's convictions, however, are clearly much too fragile.
Posted by: Jamie | January 21, 2010 at 10:44 PM